Reasons Reviewers Reject and Accept Manuscripts
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Reasons reviewers reject and accept manuscripts: the strengths and weaknesses in medical education reports.
PURPOSE Scientific journals rely on peer review to maintain the high quality and standards of papers accepted for publication. The purpose of this study was to explore the strengths and weaknesses of medical education reports by analyzing the ratings and written comments given by external reviewers. METHOD The author conducted a content analysis of reviewers' comments on 151 research manuscri...
متن کاملAccept-Reject Decisions and Probabilistic Failure Prediction
The purpose of this paper is to discuss recent progress in the development of an NDE decision formalism applied to the case of brittle fracture in ceramics. The on-line input into the formalism is a set of nondestructive (ND) measurements and the on-line output is the probability of failure conditioned on the above measurements. The final accept-reject decision depends only upon the comparison ...
متن کاملCommon Reasons for Rejecting Manuscripts at Medical Journals: A Survey of Editors and Peer Reviewers
Background. Most manuscripts submitted to medical journals are rejected for publication, but scientific data on the reasons are sparse. Some suggest that flaws occur with random frequency; others claim that deficiencies are too diverse to measure. Methods. In 1995, an eight-page questionnaire that contained 83 questions was mailed to a random sample of 50 peer reviewers for the Journal of the A...
متن کاملRao Blackwellization of Generalized Accept Reject Schemes
This paper extends the accept reject algorithm to allow the pro posal distribution to change at each iteration We rst establish a necessary and su cient condition for this generalized accept reject al gorithm to be valid and then show how the Rao Blackwellization of Casella and Robert can be extended to this setting An impor tant application of these results is to the perfect sampling technique...
متن کاملAccept & reject statement-based uncertainty models
The agent gives an assessment by making statements about gambles f : Accepting (⊕) implies a commitment: (i) outcome ω ∈Ω is determined, (ii) he receives the payoff f (ω). Rejecting (⊖) implies that he considers accepting f unreasonable; this is relevant when combining assessments. An assessment is a pair A ∶= ⟨A⪰;A≺⟩ in A ∶= 2 × 2 of sets of acceptable respectively dispreferred gambles. Unreso...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Academic Medicine
سال: 2001
ISSN: 1040-2446
DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200109000-00010